This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities...
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
    • Latest News
    • Politics
    • Transport
    • Lifestyle
    • Community
    • Business
    • Crime
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Education
    • Sport
    • Harrogate
    • Ripon
    • Knaresborough
    • Boroughbridge
    • Pateley Bridge
    • Masham
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts

Interested in advertising with us?

Advertise with us

  • News & Features
  • Your Area
  • What's On
  • Offers
  • Newsletter
  • Podcasts
  • Latest News
  • Politics
  • Transport
  • Lifestyle
  • Community
  • Business
  • Crime
  • Environment
  • Health
  • Education
  • Sport
Advertise with us
Subscribe
  • Home
  • News

We want to hear from you

Tell us your opinions and views on what we cover

Contact us

Register for our newsletter

Free Newsletter Sign Up

Join now
Connect with us
  • About us
  • Correction and complaints
Download on App StoreDownload on Google Play Store
  • Website Terms & Conditions
  • Subscription Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Comments Participation T&Cs
Trust In Journalism

Copyright © 2020 The Stray Ferret Ltd, All Rights Reserved

Site by Show + Tell

Thank you for your interest in this story

To continue reading this article, sign up today to unlock exclusive content and be part of our community discussions

  • Exclusive discounts
  • Enjoy commenting on local issues

Already a subscriber? Log in here.

26

May 2024

News
News

Redevelopment of key Starbeck building on hold as owners negotiate contribution

Published: 26 May 2024, 06:10 BST

by John Grainger

Comment

0

harpersbuilding-mccolls
How the shop used to look before McColl's left in 2016 and the building was gutted by fire two years later.

The redevelopment of a landmark building in Starbeck is being held up due to a dispute regarding the amount of money the owners should contribute towards construction costs, the Stray Ferret understands. 

The Harper’s building on the High Street has stood empty since newsagent McColl’s moved out eight years ago, and has been a burnt-out shell since arsonists set fire to it in 2018. 

As we reported in February, its owners have a well-developed proposal to replace the old structure with a new block of retail units and 24 one-bedroom social housing flats above. 

They already have permission to demolish the current building, but that expires on January 17, 2025, so planning permission for the new development needs to be in place before then. 

The old Harper's building in Starbeck.

How the building looks now.



But as yet, the owners have not applied for planning permission for the new development because they are still in dispute with North Yorkshire Council over building costs. 

Because the plans contain ‘social, rented only’ accommodation, the council required a feasibility study to be carried out relating to the building costs.

According to postmaster Andrew Hart, who runs the Red Box gift shop and post office opposite the Harper’s building, that study deemed the developers’ estimate of the building costs per square foot to be about 20% too high, and the council demanded costs be cut before it would consider approving any planning application.

But he said the owners believe that cutting costs would lead to a reduction in the number of flats, making the whole project impossible and turning it into a “financial black hole”.

Mr Hart has been campaigning for the Harper’s building to be brought back to life for many years, and, although he has no personal stake in the property, was given day-to-day stewardship of the site three years ago by the owners.

He told the Stray Ferret:

“The owners have invested thousands of pounds in both gaining the demolition permission and putting together what I consider to be a flagship building for Starbeck. This proposed building will put Starbeck on the map. People travelling into Harrogate will be impressed by its presence. 
“More importantly, it will provide homes for so many local people who want to stay near home or work. Those flats are desperately needed. There are lots of developments going on around Harrogate and Knaresborough, but nothing else of that nature.
“In cash terms, the figures they’re talking about are nothing compared with the value of the building or the economic impact its regeneration could have.”


Architect's computer-aided image of how the new development in Starbeck would look.

How the new development will look <span class="TextRun SCXW15927331 BCX8" lang="EN-US" xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span class="NormalTextRun SCXW15927331 BCX8">–</span></span> if the council grants planning permission.



He said the owners, believed to be Bates and Hemingbrough, and developer Zerum Consulting had met council planners last week to discuss revised figures from a new study. He said: 

“Hopefully they won’t be too far adrift, because without some sort of movement from the council, the owners just can’t afford to go ahead with their plans to regenerate the site. 
“I just wish that Harrogate’s councillors would go and have a word [with the planning committee] and say ‘Come on, lads – sort it out’. Because this just keeps going on and on and on, and in the meantime, building costs continue to rise, money is still expensive and the demand for homes of any kind increases.” 


Cllr Philip Broadbank, who represents the Fairfax and Starbeck division on North Yorkshire Council, said the situation seemed to be “going round in circles and getting nowhere”. 

He said he could not comment on any planning application explicitly, as that would disqualify him from voting on it as a member of the council’s planning committee, but added: 

“As I understand it, the owners don’t want any social housing on the site, so they have to make a contribution to the council’s social housing fund, and that’s what the dispute is about. 
“All the owners need to do, while they’re in discussions about the amount of money to contribute, is exhibit their plans to the public – St Andrew’s Church next door has offered space for this – and then tweak them according to feedback and get their planning application in. They should demolish the existing building in readiness too. It should be quite simple.” 


The Stray Ferret asked North Yorkshire Council whether it considered the redevelopment of the site as a local priority. A spokesperson replied: 

“We do not have a live planning application under consideration for the redevelopment of this site. 
“There is a consent to demolish which expires in January 2025 – if it does expire, they could apply again, or include demolition as part of their planning proposals. The demolition consent reference number is 21/04830/PND and can be viewed on Public Access via our website.”






Read more:



  • Plans revealed to transform Starbeck's Harper's building

  • 'Viability' issues continue to delay revival of Starbeck's Harper's building

  • Plan to demolish 'eyesore' Starbeck building finally approved