Station Gateway: Too much money and creates no-go zones, say residents

Local residents said Harrogate’s £10.9 million Station Gateway scheme could mean unsafe “no-go zones” in the town centre and bottleneck traffic on Station Parade.

The second face-to-face consultation into the project was held today in Victoria Shopping Centre.

The scheme, which could lead to a reduction in parking spaces, the part-pedestrianisation of James Street and potentially up to a year of major road works, received a mixed response.

The main comments from people were about whether the total cost was balanced by the impact on the town and if pedestrianisation will create unsafe areas.

Chris and Maria Littlefair, from Killinghall, questioned whether it was enough to reduce the number of cars on the road. They said:

“Why isn’t there more money being spent on updating the bus station? If they want more people on it they need to make it look more attractive.

“If there’s no alternative to it or a way of getting cars out the centre completely then they need to do something, but I don’t know if this is the solution.”

Gordon Pearson, who will be directly affected on Mount Parade, said:

“Overall I think it’s a good idea but I live on Mount Parade and there will be traffic regulations on the street. The turning from Cheltenham Parade to Mount Parade seems ridiculous to me.

“I think they’re spending a lot of money making the town look pretty but I don’t think it will make much difference.I’d like to see some improvements but I don’t think the amount of spending is acceptable.”

James Street could become a “no-go zone”

Local resident Emma Knight said:

“I think it’s a lot of money to spend on one small thing when it’s a bigger problem we have. Harrogate had a bit of a disadvantage as it’s on a hill and I’m a keen cyclist but its geography is against it. There needs to be infrastructure around the town not just one spot.

“All these streets that might be pedestrianised won’t be safe, when they shut the town down like that it becomes a no-go zone.”

Louise echoed Ms Knight’s concerns:

“My other major concern is pedestrianising the top of James Street. At night if you have to get to the train station, which they’re promoting, you have to work through yet another pedestrianised area which isn’t something I would be happy doing.

“Compared to Cambridge Street and near the theatre, James Street is the safe route in the town because there are cars through the night. So my compromise would be to allow cars to use it at night so people feel safe.

Read more:

Concern was raised over an increase of traffic on King’s Road and Station Parade when it becomes one lane.

John said the emissions created by waiting cars could put people and cyclists off visiting:

“At the moment I think it’s a vanity project, there’s money available and this is how it’s being used. They are talking about gentrifying Victoria Gardens but it will still be a main through-fare so the emissions fromt he vehicles will still be present, will people still sit there?”

For more information and to have your say on the project visit the consultation page here.

Starbeck residents raise concerns over street drinking

Residents in Starbeck last night raised concerns about an increase in street drinking and elected a new committee and chair who pledged to tackle the problem.

Starbeck Residents’ Association, which awards grants and campaigns to safeguard local facilities, had its annual general meeting at St Andrew’s Church. It was well-attended with about 80 residents packed into a room inside the church.

Some raised concerns about the “massive issue” of street drinking, with others saying they felt intimidated.

One said:

“Street drinking is a massive issue that needs to be addressed. People drinking during the day using Belmont Park. It’s not good and it’s a continuous problem.”

Another said:

“Older people feel extremely intimidated. It’s in doorways and in parks.”

Some residents suggested the problem had increased since the council’s homeless shelter Fern House opened this year.

Maggie Gibson, a housing officer from Harrogate Borough Council who works at Fern House, rejected this.

She said:

“There is an assumption it’s our residents. That is unfair. We monitor their behaviour.”

The work at Fern House was praised by SRA treasurer and nearby resident Leisa Mark, who encouraged residents to speak to the people that live there.

“Rather than being intimidated, we said hello. They are aware of how people perceive them.”

Read More: 

New chair

Chris Watt was voted in as the new SRA chair, replacing the outgoing Geoff Foxall.

Mr Watt was voted in by all but two residents, including Starbeck post office owner Andrew Hart who objected to his appointment due to Mr Watt’s affiliation with the local Labour Party.

A new 15-person committee was also elected. It included people who had lived in Starbeck for decades as well as 16-year-old Emily Mark, who spoke of her pride in living in the area.

Mr Watt told the Stray Ferret:

“We as a committee are focused on issues that are important to Starbeck, such as the high street, green spaces and anti-social behaviour. It’s great to have that mix of youth and experience on the committee.”

Grants awarded

The SRA also announced the recipients of four grants to local charities and organisations.

The grants come from interest on a £300,000 gift that was given to the Starbeck community by Taylor Woodrow, a steel fabrication company that moved away from Starbeck in the early 1990s. The grants are administered by Harrogate Borough Council.

These were:

£1,000 to Harrogate Railway Football Club for new nets.

£1,000 to Starbeck in Bloom to improve the area around the war memorial.

£1,000 to the charity Henshaws for new IT equipment

£400 to Starbeck Methodist Church to promote events.

‘Political bias’ row in Starbeck over appointment of residents’ group chair

A political row has broken out in Starbeck over the election of a new chair to a residents’ group tonight.

Chris Watt has put his name forward to be on the committee of Starbeck Residents’ Association and to become its new chair.

The association, which awards grants and campaigns to safeguard local facilities, holds its annual general meeting at St Andrew’s Church in Starbeck at 7.30pm.

A vote will take place to appoint a new chair, vice-chair, secretary and treasurer and a new committee will be appointed.

However, Mr Watt’s decision to stand has attracted criticism from a local business owner because he is a member of Harrogate and Knaresborough Labour Party.

Andrew Hart, who owns the Red Box Post Office on Starbeck High Street, told the Stray Ferret he opposed Mr Watt standing because his decisions could be influenced by his Labour affiliation.

The group’s current chair, Geoff Foxall, also has connections with the local Labour party.

Mr Hart pointed to the association’s constitution, which states one of its objectives is to be “a strong non-political community voice” that represents the views of Starbeck residents.

He said this meant active political party members should be prevented from standing for senior positions.

Read More: 

He added:

“I think for the sake of transparency the Starbeck Residents’ Association needs to be dissolved tonight and hold full and proper elections in one month’s time without any political office holders standing.”

Mr Hart set up a group called Starbeck Community Group this year to debate Starbeck issues.

Mr Watt told the Stray Ferret he would not comment until after the AGM tonight.

Bilton residents voice frustration over crime at public meeting

There was frustration and anger at a meeting of Bilton and Woodfield Residents’ Association last night about crime and anti-social behaviour in the area.

Residents voiced criticism towards North Yorkshire Police for a perceived lack of action over the issue.

The meeting was held at Bilton Grange United Reform Church and residents asked questions to a panel that included PC Brendan Frith from NYP, Bilton Conservative councillors Matt Scott and Paul Haslam, Liberal Democrat councillor and Mayor of Harrogate Trevor Chapman and Julia Stack from Harrogate Borough Council’s safer communities team.

It was chaired by Reverend Alan Crump who invited questions from around 30 residents that were in attendance.

The main topic of debate was anti-social behaviour and crime with several questions focusing on issues around the Woodfield Road and Albany Avenue areas of Bilton.

One person received a round of applause after they said the area had deteriorated.

“I’ve been on this street for 50 years and it’s never been like this. Good neighbours are moving out and we are sick of it”.

Another said:

“We’re stuck here but we’re not living the lives we want to live. Nothing gets done.”

Cllr Scott, whose Bilton ward includes Woodfield Road, said he is in regular contact with residents of Albany Avenue about what he called “a very complex situation”.

He added:

“There is an issue with tenants who don’t respect neighbours. That isn’t right. They are being let down by a small minority.”.

Read More:

Andrew Hart, the owner of Bilton’s post office, said the community police officers in Bilton were doing a “good job” but his reports of suspected drug dealing had been ignored. Other residents told the panel that they did not have faith that their reports to police would be followed up.

Mr Hart said:

“I sent names of drug dealers dealing crack to NYP. Did I get a response? No, nothing seems to happen and you feel like you’ve interrupted them.”

In response, PC Frith said the police often need more information before they can take action. Cllr Haslam also urged residents to report any suspected criminality to the police.

PC Frith said:

“We need a lot of information. If we want warrants for a drugs bust we need information from more than one person. We need to be sure that we will get results.”

Speeding

Also discussed was speeding in Bilton, with calls to make the whole of the Harrogate suburb a 20mph zone.

Cllr Scott said he was in favour of traffic calming measures in Bilton but there were obstacles to overcome.

“Getting a 20 mph zone is not as easy as I’d like it to be. I can’t wave a magic wand and get them.”

PC Frith reiterated that the public must report to the police issues of crime or anti-social behaviour, including speeding.

“We’ve had zero reports of speeding on Woodfield Road. We know it’s happening but we need reports.”

‘Save our trees’ plea from Harrogate residents

A group of Harrogate residents have raised concerns after a property developer chopped down five trees in the grounds of St Mary’s Church.

One of the residents, Matthew Weller, said he noticed that three trees had been felled last week. A couple of days later he woke to the sound of chainsaws.

It is unclear at this time whether the trees are protected or in a conservation area. The council is investigating.

Mr Weller rushed out of his flat as he watched the fourth tree fall. He asked to see their workman’s paperwork but said he was dismissed. The workers chopped down a fifth tree soon after.

He told the Stray Ferret:

“The planning department has not made any decision on the original planning application from a year ago so we stopped paying attention to it. We are not trying to halt this process, we recognise that it needs redevelopment. This group just wants the best possible outcome for everyone.”

Read more:

The group has now got 45 members and has called a meeting for residents outside Westcliffe Hall at 4pm this Saturday. The organisers have asked just one person per household to attend.

St Mary’s Church on Harlow Terrace dates back to 1916 and is a Grade II* Listed Building. The church has structural problems and is in need of a lot of work.

What remains of the trees at St Mary’s Church.

The Stray Ferret approached Hattersley Property Solutions as well as Shaw and Jagger Architects with a request for comment. Both said they were not responsible for the felling of trees.

A spokesman for Harrogate Borough Council told the Stray Ferret that it is considering placing a Tree Preservation Order on the remaining trees:

“We have been made aware of trees that have been removed from the site and we are now looking into whether that has been a breach of planning conditions, or not.”

Those who deliberately destroy a protected tree face fines up to £20,000 per tree through a magistrates’ court.