Readers’ Letters: ‘I am tired of these endless roadworks – they’ve had a huge impact on my business’Readers’ Letters: Rewilding in Harrogate is okay – but not everywhereReaders’ Letters: New housing needs ‘simple and cheap’ adjustmentsReaders’ Letters: Station Gateway should be scrapped amid Spring StatementReaders’ Letters: Driving around Harrogate is becoming difficult and slowReaders’ Letters: Harrogate Station Gateway scheme would disrupt daily lifeReaders’ Letters: ‘Shameful’ empty super-green council properties need tenantsReaders’ Letters: Knaresborough’s land train proposal ‘makes no sense’Readers’ Letters: Ripon should have world class facilities for the city’s visitorsStray Views: Concerns about housing scheme for Harrogate’s Knox Lane

Stray Views is a weekly column giving you the chance to have your say on issues affecting the Harrogate district. It is an opinion column and does not reflect the views of the Stray Ferret. Send your views to letters@thestrayferret.co.uk.

Knox Lane and affordable homes

The report compiled by the case officer for Harrogate Borough Council about the proposed Knox Lane housing development ignores many facts.

It appears the application submitted in April 2020 is a Stonewater Housing Association/Jomast joint venture.

In the application for 73 homes, only 10 were open market. Fifty homes, including 10 open market ,were proposed on the allocated site, 80% affordable, the remaining 23 affordable homes were on adjacent unallocated land. The number of affordable (86.3%) is more than double Harrogate Borough Council’s HS2 Policy, despite pre-application discussions having taken place with council officers in September 2019. The following statements were included in supporting documentation with the application:

It is important to note that it was the applicant’s aspiration to provide a full affordable housing scheme on the site. However, an element of market dwellings has been introduced at the request of the council based on their reasoning that it would provide a more balanced scheme.

Due to the uncertainty in respect to the length of any lockdown and the fact that the scheme has already been consulted upon and the site is now an allocation, it is considered appropriate to submit the application rather than delay until some form of meaningful consultant can be carried out at some undetermined point in the future. There is a clear and pressing need for the delivery of housing of all forms within Harrogate.

Despite the application not being compliant with Harrogate Borough Council Local Plan policies it remained on the planning portal with consultees being contacted.

The revised application submitted in December 2021 excluded the 23 affordable homes on the unallocated land but included 30 (56.6%) in the new plan, still in excess of Harrogate Borough Council affordable homes policy and contrary to NPPF 47.

Consultations with residents were held in February and March 2018 when the land agent advised a proposal for 100% affordable homes on behalf of Wakefield and District Housing Association. It is now almost five years since these consultations were held yet no further consultations have been.

The link to Knox Country Park was requested by the case officer. He apparently has not considered the impact this will have on the newly planted habitat for wildlife. The extract from the ecological report submitted on behalf of the developer suggests the increase in footfall would.

Knox Lane comprised a single-lane road and associated footpath. It was lined on both sides by tree lines (including that one the western site boundary) and grass verges, with managed agricultural land beyond to the west. The tree lines may offer some nesting habitat for birds and foraging and commuting habitat for bats, but Knox Lane itself offers negligible suitable habitat for wildlife, comprising impermeable, artificial surfaces that are disturbed by human activity on a regular basis. As such, this area was assessed to be of low ecological value.

Catherine Alderson, Harrogate

Pollution and the River Nidd

I have today received a newsletter from the Conservative Party promoting our local MP Andrew Jones. The lead story covering the front page concerns the River Nidd, highlighting the work he is doing to improve the quality of the water in the river.

Can this possibly be the same Andrew Jones who represents the Conservative Party that has reduced the powers of the Environment Agency to prosecute offending water companies? That will not force private water companies, who pay substantial salaries to board members and huge dividends to shareholders, to carry out their duty to the public and refrain from putting sewerage into rivers in the first place.
The sheer hypocrisy is beyond belief.
Graham Dixon, Harrogate

More memories of Hotel St George

Further to Kathleen Mitchell’s letter last week. Bill Pritchard and Eddie  Jack were still working at the hotel when my husband John Abel and Peter Pointer bought the hotel in 1970.

They both were excellent porters and I have very happy memories about them both.
So good to see your letter Kathleen Mitchell.
Vivien Abel, Harrogate

Do you have an opinion on the Harrogate district? Email us at letters@thestrayferret.co.uk. Please include your name and approximate location details. Limit your letters to 350 words. We reserve the right to edit letters.